Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.. Published Online First: 20 August 2009. doi:10.1136/adc.2009.164533
Copyright © 2009 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health.

Original articles

The PREM score: a graphical tool for predicting survival in very preterm births

Tim J Cole 1*, Edmund N Hey 2 and Sam Richmond 3

1 UCL Institute of Child Health, United Kingdom
2 Retired paediatrician, United Kingdom
3 Sunderland Royal Hospital, United Kingdom

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: tim.cole{at}ich.ucl.ac.uk.

Accepted 6 August 2009


Abstract

Objective: To develop a tool for predicting survival to term in babies born more than eight weeks early using only information available at or before birth.

Design: 1456 non-malformed very preterm babies of 22–31 weeks gestation born in 2000-03 in the North of England, and 3382 births of 23-31 weeks born in 2000–04 in Trent.

Outcome: Survival to term, predicted from information available a) at birth, and b) at onset of labour or delivery.

Method: Development of a logistic regression model (the Prematurity Risk Evaluation Measure or PREM score) based on gestation, birthweight for gestation, and base deficit from umbilical cord blood.

Results: Gestation was by far the most powerful predictor of survival to term, and as few as five extra days can double the chance of survival. Weight for gestation also had a powerful but non-linear effect on survival, with weight between the median and 85th centile predicting the highest survival. Using this information survival can be predicted almost as accurately before birth as after, although base deficit further improves the prediction. A simple graph is described that shows how the two main variables gestation and weight for gestation interact to predict the chance of survival.

Conclusion: The PREM score can be used to predict the chance of survival at or before birth almost as accurately as existing measures influenced by post-delivery condition; to balance risk at entry into a controlled trial; and to adjust for differences in ‘case mix’ when assessing the quality of perinatal care.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This Article

Services
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Latest from ADC

 

ADC is co-owned by the RCPCH and is the official journal of the European Academy of Paediatrics

BMJ Careers - Latest Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs

Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs