Arch. Dis. Child

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
[Advanced]

Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.. Published Online First: 27 February 2008. doi:10.1136/adc.2007.132076
Copyright © 2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in ADC Online
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hoellering, A. B
Right arrow Articles by Tingay, D. G
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hoellering, A. B
Right arrow Articles by Tingay, D. G

Original articles

Lung volume and Cardiorespiratory changes during open and closed endotracheal suction in ventilated newborn infants

Adam B Hoellering 1*, Beverley Copnell 1, Peter Anderson Dargaville 2, John F Mills 1, Colin J Morley 3 and David G Tingay 1

1 Royal Children's Hospital, Australia
2 Royal Hobart Hospital, Australia
3 Royal Women's Hospital, Australia

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: abhoellering{at}doctors.org.uk.

Accepted 13 February 2008


*   Abstract

Objectives: To compare change in lung volume ({Delta}VL)using respiratory inductive plethysmography (RIP), time to recover pre-suction lung volume (trec) and the cardiorespiratory disturbances associated with open suction (OS) and closed suction (CS) in ventilated infants. Design: Randomised blinded cross-over trial. Setting: Neonatal intensive care unit. Patients: Thirty neonates, 20 receiving SIMV and 10 HFOV (four receiving muscle relaxant). Interventions: OS and CS were performed, in a random order, on each infant using a 6FG catheter at -19kPa for 6s and repeated after one minute. Outcome measures: {Delta}VL, oxygen saturation (SpO2) and heart rate were continuously recorded from two minutes before until five minutes after suction. Lowest values were identified during 60s after suction. Results: There were variations in all parameters during CS and OS. During SIMV no differences were found between OS and CS for maximum {Delta}VL or trec; mean (95%CI) difference of 3.5 mL/kg (-2.8, 9.7) and 4s (-5, 13) respectively. During HFOV trec was longer during OS by 13s [0, 27]) but there was no difference in the maximum {Delta}VL of 0.1 mV [-0.02, 0.22]). A small reduction in SpO2 with CS in the SIMV group mean difference 6% [2.1, 9.8]) was the only significant difference in physiological measurements. Conclusions: Both OS and CS produced transient variable reductions in heart rate and SpO2. During SIMV there was no difference between OS and CS in {Delta}VL or trec. During HFOV there was no difference in loss of lung volume but a slightly longer time to recover after OS.


Keywords: endotracheal suction, infant, newborn, mechanical ventilation, neonatal respiratory, respiratory inductive plethysmography







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
ARCH DIS CHILD FETAL NEONATAL ED ED PRACTICE
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health