Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Published Online First: 8 April 2009. doi:10.1136/adc.2008.155945
Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition 2009;94:F461-F463
Copyright © 2009 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health.

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Potential hazard of the Neopuff T-piece resuscitator in the absence of flow limitation

C P Hawkes, O A Oni, E M Dempsey, C A Ryan

Department of Neonatology, Cork University Maternity Hospital, Cork, Ireland

Correspondence to Professor C A Ryan, Department of Neonatology, Cork University Maternity Hospital, Wilton, Cork, Ireland; tony.ryan{at}hse.ie

Objective: (1) To assess peak inspiratory pressure (PIP), positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) and maximum pressure relief (Pmax) at different rates of gas flow, when the Neopuff had been set to function at 5 l/min. (2) To assess maximum PIP and PEEP at a flow rate of 10 l/min with a simulated air leak of 50%.

Design: 5 Neopuffs were set to a PIP of 20, PEEP of 5 and Pmax of 30 cm H2O at a gas flow of 5 l/min. PIP, PEEP and Pmax were recorded at flow rates of 10, 15 l/min and maximum flow. Maximum achievable pressures at 10 l/min gas flow, with a 50% air leak, were measured.

Results: At gas flow of 15 l/min, mean PEEP increased to 20 (95% CI 20 to 21), PIP to 28 (95% CI 28 to 29) and the Pmax to 40 cm H2O (95% CI 38 to 42). At maximum flow (85 l/min) a PEEP of 71 (95% CI 51 to 91) and PIP of 92 cm H2O (95% CI 69 to 115) were generated. At 10 l/min flow, with an air leak of 50%, the maximum PEEP and PIP were 21 (95% CI 19 to 23) and 69 cm H2O (95% CI 66 to 71).

Conclusions: The maximum pressure relief valve is overridden by increasing the rate of gas flow and potentially harmful PIP and PEEP can be generated. Even in the presence of a 50% gas leak, more than adequate pressures can be provided at 10 l/min gas flow. We recommend the limitation of gas flow to a rate of 10 l/min as an added safety mechanism for this device.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Potential hazards of the Neopuff: using appropriate gas flow
C J Morley, G M Schmölzer, and P G Davis
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2009 94: F467-F468. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Potential hazard of the Neopuff T-piece resuscitator in the absence of flow limitation
C A Ryan, C P Hawkes, O A Oni, and E M Dempsey
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2009 94: F468. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Potential hazard of the Neopuff T-piece resuscitator in the absence of flow limitation
Georg M Schmölzer, et al.
Fetal Neonatal Ed. Online, 5 May 2009 [Full text]
Potential hazard of the Neopuff T-piece resuscitator in the absence of flow limitation
C Anthony Ryan, et al.
Fetal Neonatal Ed. Online, 15 Jul 2009 [Full text]
Potential hazards of the Neopuff
Colin J Morley, et al.
Fetal Neonatal Ed. Online, 26 Aug 2009 [Full text]

This Article

Services
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Latest from ADC

 

ADC is co-owned by the RCPCH and is the official journal of the European Academy of Paediatrics

BMJ Careers - Latest Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs

Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs