Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition 2009;94:F265-F267
ORIGINAL ARTICLES
Do babies with isolated single umbilical artery need routine postnatal renal ultrasonography?
1 Department of Paediatrics, Royal Shrewsbury Hospital, Shrewsbury, UK
2 Department of Radiology, Royal Shrewsbury Hospital, Shrewsbury, UK
3 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Shrewsbury Hospital, Shrewsbury, UK
Dr S A Deshpande, Royal Shrewsbury Hospital, Mytton Oak Road, Shrewsbury SY3 8XQ, UK; sanjeev.deshpande{at}rsh.nhs.uk
Background: The presence of isolated single umbilical artery (SUA) in infants has been associated with an increased risk of occult renal malformations. However, the need for routine postnatal renal imaging of such infants, especially in an era of now routine antenatal fetal sonography, is controversial.
Aim: To determine the prevalence of significant renal anomalies and the need for routine postnatal renal imaging in infants with isolated SUA.
Methods: Consecutive infants born over 6 years with isolated SUA were offered renal sonography at 4–8 weeks of age. The prevalence of clinically significant renal anomalies in these infants was compared with that detected through routine antenatal fetal scanning and postnatal case findings in a geographically defined control cohort.
Results: During the study period, SUA was found in 137 of 33 067 (4.1/1000) live born infants. Infants with isolated SUA (n = 129) were significantly more likely to be preterm and small for gestational age. 122 infants with isolated SUA (95%) underwent renal ultrasonography; only two infants (1.6%, 95% CI 0.20 to 5.5) had clinically significant renal anomalies, a prevalence similar to that in the control cohort (0.4%, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.45; p = 0.74). Four of eight infants with coexistent systemic malformations had abnormal postnatal renal imaging.
Conclusion: The presence of isolated SUA is associated with increased risk of prematurity and fetal growth restriction. In this largest series of isolated SUA, there was no excess of significant renal malformations among infants with isolated SUA. Postnatal renal ultrasonography is not routinely warranted in such infants.
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati What's this?
eLetters:
Read all eLetters
- SUA and renal anomalies:it is not as common as expected
- K M Adhikari
- Fetal Neonatal Ed. Online, 12 Jan 2009 [Full text]
- Full Text
- Full Text (PDF)
-
All Versions of this Article:
adc.2007.136085v1
94/4/F265 most recent - Submit a response
- Read responses to this article
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me when eLetters are posted
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- Citation Map
Services
- Email this link to a friend
- Similar articles in ADC Online
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Add article to my folders
- Download to citation manager
- Request Permissions
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
