Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Published Online First: 22 May 2008. doi:10.1136/adc.2007.126458
Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition 2009;94:F8-F12
Copyright © 2009 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health.

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

A case definition for national and international neonatal bloodstream infection surveillance

N Modi1, C J Doré2, A Saraswatula1, M Richards3, K B Bamford3,4, R Coello4, A Holmes4,5

1 Division of Medicine, Section of Neonatal Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
2 Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit, London, UK
3 Department of Microbiology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
4 Department of Infectious Diseases and Immunity, Imperial College London, London, UK
5 The Centre for Patient Safety and Service Quality, Imperial College London, London, UK

N Modi, Division of Medicine, Section of Neonatal Medicine, Chelsea and Westminster Campus, Imperial College London, London, UK; n.modi{at}imperial.ac.uk

Objective: Neonatal bloodstream infection (BSI) is a major contributor to mortality, health service costs, and the population burden of lifelong neurodisability. BSI surveillance, an essential component of infection control, requires an unambiguous standardised case definition as variability would invalidate any comparative analyses. In neonates a high proportion of blood cultures yield a mixed growth or skin commensals, principally coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS). As this might represent either genuine BSI or contamination, clinical correlates are necessary, but this adds to the difficulty of agreeing an objective, standardised case definition.

Design: Utilising data from 26 UK neonatal units, the population prevalence of 12 predefined clinical signs of infection captured daily for 28 days was evaluated. The sensitivity, specificity, odds ratio and positive predictive value of each sign and sequential numbers of grouped signs were determined to develop a predictive model for a positive blood culture. Sandwich estimates of the standard errors of the logistic regression coefficients were used to take account of the correlations between these repeated measures. The model was tested in an independent data set.

Results: >=3 clinical signs had the best predictive accuracy for a positive blood culture (76.2% specificity; 61.5%, 46.9% and 78.2% sensitivity for all positive cultures, cultures yielding CoNS, or a recognised pathogen, respectively).

Conclusion: This study suggests that a simple case definition for national and international neonatal BSI surveillance is provided by a blood culture yielding a recognised pathogen in pure culture, or a mixed growth or skin commensal plus >=3 predefined clinical signs.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Fantoms
Martin Ward Platt
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2009 94: F1. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Latest from ADC

 

ADC is co-owned by the RCPCH and is the official journal of the European Academy of Paediatrics

BMJ Careers - Latest Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs

Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs