Arch. Dis. Child

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Published Online First: 17 August 2007. doi:10.1136/adc.2006.113597
Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition 2008;93:F217-F221
Copyright © 2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
adc.2006.113597v1
adc.2006.113597v2
93/3/F217    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in ADC Online
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Samaan, M C
Right arrow Articles by Ryan, C A
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Samaan, M C
Right arrow Articles by Ryan, C A

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Doctors’ and nurses’ attitudes towards neonatal ethical decision making in Ireland

M C Samaan1,2,3, M Cuttini1,2,3, V Casotto1,2,3, C A Ryan1,2,3

1 Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, University College Cork, Erinville Hospital, Cork, Ireland
2 Unit of Epidemiology, Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù, Rome, Italy
3 Unit of Epidemiology, Regional Health Agency of Tuscany, Florence, Italy

Correspondence to:
Dr M C Samaan, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, 555 University Avenue, Ontario M5G 1X8, Canada; mcsamaan1{at}yahoo.com

Objective: To explore the clinical staff attitudes towards ethical decision making in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in Ireland, to establish differences between doctors and nurses and to compare attitudes in Ireland with those in Europe.

Design: Cross-sectional study by means of an anonymous questionnaire. 64 doctors and 228 nurses in seven NICUs participated (response rates 74% and 81%, respectively). Through factor analysis the staff answers to 12 attitude statements were used to build a score whose range varied from 0 (preservation of life in any case) to 10, indicating a more individualised approach according to the patient’s best interests.

Main outcome measure: Staff attitudes to ethical decision making in NICU.

Results: Mean values of attitude scores were 5.8 (95% CI 5.3 to 6.2) for doctors, and 6.0 (95% CI 5.5 to 6.5) for nurses. Respondents with experience in follow-up of NICU graduates had significantly higher scores (6.7 vs 5.4, p = 0.018), while the opposite was true among more religious staff (5.8 vs 6.9, p = 0.026) and particularly for minority religions such as Muslim (4.1, 95% CI 3.1 to 5.2). Scores were higher after age 30 for nurses, and after age 40 for doctors, suggesting the adoption of a less vitalistic viewpoint as respondents grow older and more experienced. Among doctors, a relationship was found between the attitude score and their self-reported non-treatment practices.

Conclusions: In Ireland, NICU doctors and nurses hold similar attitudes towards ethical decision making. Personal and professional factors have a statistically significant impact on attitude score. Compared with the rest of Europe, attitudes in Ireland appear more similar to those of southern rather than northern European countries.








HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
ARCH DIS CHILD FETAL NEONATAL ED ED PRACTICE
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health