Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition 2008;93:F100-F103
ORIGINAL ARTICLES
Lingual sucrose reduces the pain response to nasogastric tube insertion: a randomised clinical trial
1 Department of Child Health, Rotherham General Hospital, Rotherham, South Yorkshire, UK
2 Department of Pharmacy, Rotherham General Hospital, Rotherham, South Yorkshire, UK
Correspondence to:
Dr P I Macfarlane, Department of Child Health, Rotherham General Hospital, Moorgate Road, Rotherham, South Yorkshire S60 2UD, UK; peter.macfarlane{at}rothgen.nhs.uk
Objective: To determine whether lingual sucrose modifies the pain response to nasogastric tube insertion in preterm infants.
Design: Randomised, double-blind, placebo controlled clinical trial.
Setting: Special care baby unit.
Patients: 20 stable preterm infants who required nasogastric tube insertion for feeding, randomised on 51 occasions.
Intervention: Lingual 24% sucrose or water placebo (0.5–2 ml varying with body weight) administered 2 min before nasogastric tube insertion.
Outcome measures: Heart rate, oxygen saturation (SaO2), Neonatal Facial Coding Score and presence or absence of cry.
Results: Infants who received sucrose demonstrated a significantly lower Neonatal Facial Coding Score during nasogastric tube passage compared with the placebo group (median 1 (range 0–4) vs 3 (0–4), p = 0.004). There was a trend for sucrose-treated infants to have little change in heart rate during nasogastric tube passage compared with the placebo group (mean (SD) –0.73 (23) vs +11 (17), p = 0.055). Mean SaO2 did not change significantly. Pain response measurements quickly returned to baseline after nasogastric tube insertion. Adverse effects, such as apnoea or oxygen desaturation, were few and occurred equally in each group.
Conclusions: Nasogastric tube insertion induces a pain response comparable with previously reported responses to heel lance in neonates. Single-dose lingual 24% sucrose is effective in reducing the behavioural and physiological pain response to nasogastric tube insertion in preterm infants and it appears to be safe.
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati What's this?
- Full Text
- Full Text (PDF)
-
All Versions of this Article:
adc.2006.110338v1
93/2/F100 most recent - Submit a response
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me when eLetters are posted
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- Citation Map
Services
- Email this link to a friend
- Similar articles in ADC Online
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Add article to my folders
- Download to citation manager
- Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
