Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Published Online First: 9 November 2006. doi:10.1136/adc.2006.105098
Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition 2007;92:F181-F184
Copyright © 2007 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health.

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Impact of service changes on neonatal transfer patterns over 10 years

Jonathan M Cusack1, David J Field2, Bradley N Manktelow2

1 Neonatal Unit, Kensington Building, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Infirmary Road, Leicester UK
2 Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, 22-28 Princess Road West, Leicester

Correspondence to:
Dr Jonathan Cusack
Neonatal Unit, Kensington Building, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Infirmary Road, Leicester; jonathan.cusack{at}uhl-tr.nhs.uk

Introduction: Many changes have been made to the staffing and organisation of neonatal care in the UK in the past 10 years. This study assessed the extent to which these changes had affected the transfer of babies between different parts of the service.

Methods: Data from the Trent Neonatal Survey, an ongoing study of neonatal intensive care activity in the former Trent Health Region of the UK, were used to evaluate neonatal inter-hospital transfers over a 10-year period, from 1 January 1995 to 31 December 2004. The number of transfers and the types of transfer were analysed and trends in gestation and disease severity over the study period were assessed. Rates of "inappropriate transfer" were also identified.

Results: 8105 babies were transferred over the period; 2294 babies underwent urgent postnatal transfer and this equates to approximately two such transfers every three days. The maximum number of journeys by any one baby was eight. Intensive care activity rose during the 10 years but the number of inappropriate transfers remained persistently high.

Conclusions: Organisational changes in neonatal care during the 10-year period have been insufficient to deal with the rising demand, as reflected by the persistently high rate of inappropriate transfers.

Abbreviations: CRIB, critical risk index for babies; CSAG, Clinical Standards Advisory Group; TNS, Trent Neonatal Survey

Keywords: transport; neonatal networks; centralisation


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Fantoms
Ben Stenson
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2007 92: F157. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Neonatal transfers – a thin layer of glue to keep the service network together?
Gorm Greisen
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2007 92: F159-F160. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Greisen, G. (2007). Neonatal transfers - a thin layer of glue to keep the service network together?. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 92: F159-F160 [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Latest from ADC

 

ADC is co-owned by the RCPCH and is the official journal of the European Academy of Paediatrics

BMJ Careers - Latest Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs

Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs