Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition 2006;91:F327-F329
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Risk management, or just a different risk?
Simpson Centre for Reproductive Health, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Little France, Edinburgh EH16 4SA, Scotland, UK
Correspondence to:
Dr Lyon
Simpson Centre for Reproductive Health, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Little France, Edinburgh EH16 4SA, Scotland, UK; Andrew.lyon{at}luht.scot.nhs.uk
Background: National reporting of adverse incidents has resulted in a number of clinical alerts being issued. Despite a lack of evidence, these alerts are often accompanied by a mandatory requirement to alter practice. There is likely to be clinician resistance to such a method of change management, particularly where evidence of safety is missing.
Aim: To determine the level of implementation within neonatal units of an alert requiring the change from litmus to pH paper to test nasogastric tube position.
Method: A questionnaire sent to all neonatal units in the United Kingdom with more than 12 cots.
Results: From the 207 questionnaires sent, there were 165 (80%) responses. Fifty five percent of units were still using litmus. All continued to use supplementary tests not recommended in best practice statements issued at the time of the alert. There was considerable variation in the pH value at which it was considered safe to feed.
Conclusions: Nine months after the alert, more than half the units had not changed to pH paper, and supplementary methods of testing were still being used. The wide range of pH values highlights the uncertainty about the "normal" gastric pH in the newborn. The evidence that, in neonatal units, changing to pH paper is safer than the long established use of litmus is lacking. Recommendations for change in practice must be based on good information and not seen just as a "knee jerk" response to adverse incidents.
Abbreviations: MHRA, Medicines and Healthcare Regulatory Agency; NPSA, National Patient Safety Agency; NGT, nasogastric tube
Keywords: nasogastric tubes; change management; litmus; pH paper
Relevant Articles
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati What's this?
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2006 91: F313.
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2006 91: F314-F315.
- Full Text
- Full Text (PDF)
-
All Versions of this Article:
adc.2005.089540v1
91/5/F327 most recent - Submit a response
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me when eLetters are posted
- Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
- Email this link to a friend
- Similar articles in ADC Online
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Add article to my folders
- Download to citation manager
- Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
