ORIGINAL ARTICLE

How effectively can clinical examination pick up congenital heart disease at birth?

C Patton¹, E Hey²

¹ Maternity Unit, Wansbeck Hospital, Ashington, Northumberland, UK
² Retired Paediatrician, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK

Correspondence to:
C Patton
Maternity Unit, Wansbeck General Hospital, Ashington, Northumberland NE63 9JJ, UK; Clare.Patton{at}northumbria-healthcare.nhs.uk

Aims: To assess what proportion of all cardiac abnormality can be suspected at birth when all clinical examination before discharge is undertaken by a small stable team of clinicians.

Methods: A prospective audit of all the 14 572 births in a maternity unit only staffed by nurse practitioners between 1996 and 2003.

Results: 1.2% of all babies born in the unit were found to have a structural defect (as confirmed by echocardiography) within a year of birth. The number not suspected before discharge declined over time, and only 6% were first suspected after discharge in the last four years of this eight year study. Four potentially life threatening conditions initially went unsuspected in 1996–8, but none after that. A policy of referring every term baby with a murmur at 1 day of age that was still present at 7–10 days resulted in 4.2% requiring cardiac referral; 54% of these babies still had a murmur when assessed one to two weeks later, and 33% had a structural defect. Parents said in independent, retrospectively conducted, interviews that they found it confidence building to have any possible heart defect identified early and the cause of any murmur clearly and authoritatively explained.

Conclusions: Effective screening requires experience and a clear, structured, referral pathway, but can work much better than most previous reports suggest. Whether staff bring a medical or nursing background to the task may well be of less importance.

Keywords: cardiac murmur; congenital heart disease; examination; screening

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Mahle, W. T., Newburger, J. W., Matherne, G. P., Smith, F. C., Hoke, T. R., Koppel, R., Gidding, S. S., Beekman, R. H. III, Grosse, S. D., on behalf of the American Heart Association Congen, (2009). Role of Pulse Oximetry in Examining Newborns for Congenital Heart Disease: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association and American Academy of Pediatrics. Circulation 120: 447-458 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Mahle, W. T., Newburger, J. W., Matherne, G. P., Smith, F. C., Hoke, T. R., Koppel, R., Gidding, S. S., Beekman, R. H. III, Grosse, S. D., on behalf of the American Heart Association Congen, (2009). Role of Pulse Oximetry in Examining Newborns for Congenital Heart Disease: A Scientific Statement from the AHA and AAP. Pediatrics 124: 823-836 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Karuppaswamy, V, Kelsall, W (2009). Review of paediatric cardiology services in district general hospitals in the United Kingdom. Arch. Dis. Child. 94: 327-327 [Full Text]  
• Chang, R.-K. R., Gurvitz, M., Rodriguez, S. (2008). Missed Diagnosis of Critical Congenital Heart Disease. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 162: 969-974 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Green, K, Oddie, S (2008). The value of the postnatal examination in improving child health. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 93: F389-F393 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Valmari, P. (2007). Should pulse oximetry be used to screen for congenital heart disease?. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 92: F219-F224 [Abstract] [Full Text]