HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: adc.2005.087668v1 91/3/F166    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in ADC Online Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Boyle, E M Articles by McIntosh, N Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Boyle, E M Articles by McIntosh, N Topic Collections Relevant Article

Sucrose and non-nutritive sucking for the relief of pain in screening for retinopathy of prematurity: a randomised controlled trial

¹ Neonatal Unit, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
² Neonatal Unit, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, Birmingham, UK
³ Princess Alexandra Eye Pavilion, Edinburgh
⁴ Department of Ophthalmology, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr Boyle
McMaster University Medical Centre, Department of Pediatrics, Room 4G40, 1200 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4J9, Canada; emboyle{at}doctors.org.uk

Background: Screening is necessary for infants at risk of retinopathy of prematurity. Despite local anaesthetic drops, infants find eye examinations distressing, displaying behavioural and physiological changes indicating acute pain. Oral sucrose and non-nutritive sucking reduce pain responses associated with invasive procedures.

Objective: To evaluate the use of oral sucrose and/or pacifier for reducing pain responses during eye examinations.

Methods: Forty infants <32 weeks gestation or <1500 g birth weight, in two neonatal units, were randomised to one of four interventions administered two minutes before their first screening examination: 1 ml sterile water as placebo (group 1, n = 10), 1 ml 33% sucrose solution (group 2, n = 10), 1 ml sterile water with pacifier (group 3, n = 9), or 1 ml 33% sucrose solution with pacifier (group 4, n = 11). Examinations were videotaped. Two observers, blind to the intervention, assessed recordings. Pain responses were scored using the premature infant pain profile (PIPP).

Results: The groups were similar in gestation, birth weight, and age at examination. Mean PIPP scores were 15.3, 14.3, 12.3, and 12.1 for groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 respectively. Analysis of variance showed a significant difference in PIPP score between groups (p = 0.023). Infants randomised to pacifiers scored lower than those without pacifiers (p = 0.003). There was no difference between groups receiving sucrose and those receiving water (p = 0.321).

Conclusions: Non-nutritive sucking reduced distress responses in infants undergoing screening for retinopathy of prematurity. The difference in response was large enough to be detected by a validated assessment tool. No synergistic effect of sucrose and pacifier was apparent in this group.

Keywords: premature; retinopathy of prematurity; pain; sucrose

Relevant Article

Fantoms

Ben Stenson
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2006 91: F157. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Kleberg, I. Warren, E. Norman, E. Morelius, A.-C. Berg, E. Mat-Ali, K. Holm, A. Fielder, N. Nelson, and L. Hellstrom-Westas Lower Stress Responses After Newborn Individualized Developmental Care and Assessment Program Care During Eye Screening Examinations for Retinopathy of Prematurity: A Randomized Study Pediatrics, May 1, 2008; 121(5): e1267 - e1278. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J E. Harrop Management of pain in childhood Arch. Dis. Child. Ed. Pract., August 1, 2007; 92(4): ep101 - ep108. [Full Text] [PDF]