Arch. Dis. Child

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Published Online First: 13 October 2005. doi:10.1136/adc.2005.083329
Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition 2006;91:F29-F30
Copyright © 2006 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
adc.2005.083329v1
91/1/F29    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Read responses to this article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in ADC Online
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Deshpande, S A
Right arrow Articles by Watson, H
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Deshpande, S A
Right arrow Articles by Watson, H

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Renal ultrasonography not required in babies with isolated minor ear anomalies

S A Deshpande1, H Watson2

1 Royal Shrewsbury Hospital, Mytton Oak Road, Shrewsbury SY3 8XQ, UK
2 Department of Radiology, Royal Shrewsbury Hospital

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr Deshpande
Royal Shrewsbury Hospital, Mytton Oak Road, Shrewsbury SY3 8XQ, UK; deshpande{at}which.net

Aim: To determine whether infants with isolated minor anomalies of the external ear are at increased risk of renal malformations.

Methods: Consecutive infants with isolated minor anomalies of the external ear (preauricular skin tags, preauricular sinuses, ear pits, and misshapen pinnae) were offered renal ultrasonography by experienced sonographers over a 41 month period. The prevalence of renal anomalies in such infants was compared with that detected on routine fetal scanning during the same period.

Results: Ninety six of 13 136 liveborn infants (7.3/1000, 95% confidence interval (CI) 5.9 to 8.9) were noted to have isolated minor ear anomalies on routine neonatal examination, with preauricular skin tags being the most common (85%). Ninety one (95%) infants underwent renal sonography at a mean (SD) age of 40 (19.6) days. Only one infant (1.1%, 95% CI 0.03 to 5.9) had transient unilateral pyelectasia. During the same period, non-syndromic renal anomalies were found in 0.64% (95% CI 0.52 to 0.73) of infants, a prevalence no different from that of infants with minor ear anomalies (p = 0.44).

Conclusions: Routine renal imaging is not warranted in infants with such minor external ear anomalies unless accompanied by other systemic malformations.


Keywords: preauricular skin tags; external ear; renal anomalies; ultrasound




eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Ear tags and renal anomalies: lack of association
Richard Nicholl
Fetal Neonatal Ed. Online, 10 Nov 2005 [Full text]



HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
ARCH DIS CHILD FETAL NEONATAL ED ED PRACTICE
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2006 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health