ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Neonatal research: the parental perspective

B J Stenson, J-C Becher, N McIntosh

Neonatal Unit, Simpson Centre for Reproductive Health, Royal Infirmary, Little France, Edinburgh EH16 4SU, Scotland, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr Stenson
Neonatal Unit, Simpson Centre for Reproductive Health, Royal Infirmary, Little France, Edinburgh EH16 4SU, Scotland, UK; ben.stenson{at}luht.scot.nhs.uk

Objectives: To investigate the recollections of parents consenting for their infants to be research subjects and determine their views about the need for consent.

Subjects: Parents of 154 sick newborn infants enrolled in a randomised trial in the early neonatal period. All parents had given written consent and received printed information.

Methods: A questionnaire and accompanying letter was sent to the parental home 18 months later. Non-responders were sent a further questionnaire and letter.

Results: Response rate was 64% (99/154). Some respondents (12%) did not remember being asked to consent to their baby joining a study, and a further 6% were unsure. Most of the respondents (79%) were happy, 13% neutral, and 8% unhappy with their decision to give consent. None felt heavy pressure to agree. Entering the trial caused 24% of respondents to feel more anxious, 56% neutral, and 20% less anxious about their baby. Most of the respondents (83%) would be unhappy to forgo the consent process for trials passed by the institutional ethics committee.

Conclusions: A significant proportion of parents who give written consent for a trial in the early neonatal period do not later remember having done so. Parents who have had experience of neonatal research would be unhappy for their baby to be enrolled in a study that had ethics committee approval without their consent being obtained.

Keywords: informed consent; ethics; parents; controlled trials; research

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Fantoms

Martin Ward Platt
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2004 89: F283. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Sammons, H (2009). Ethical issues of clinical trials in children: a European perspective. Arch. Dis. Child. 94: 474-477 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Freer, Y., McIntosh, N., Teunisse, S., Anand, K. J. S., Boyle, E. M. (2009). More Information, Less Understanding: A Randomized Study on Consent Issues in Neonatal Research. Pediatrics 123: 1301-1305 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Maayan-Metzger, A., Kedem-Friedrich, P., Kuint, J. (2008). Motivations of Mothers to Enroll Their Newborn Infants in General Clinical Research on Well-Infant Care and Development. Pediatrics 121: e590-e596 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Eder, M. L., Yamokoski, A. D., Wittmann, P. W., Kodish, E. D. (2007). Improving Informed Consent: Suggestions From Parents of Children With Leukemia. Pediatrics 119: e849-e859 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• McKechnie, L, Gill, A B (2006). Consent for neonatal research.. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 91: F374-F376 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Ward Platt, M (2005). Participation in multiple neonatal research studies. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 90: F191-f191 [Full Text]  
• Morley, C J, Lau, R, Davis, P G, Morse, C (2005). What do parents think about enrolling their premature babies in several research studies?. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 90: F225-f228 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Hoehn, K S, Wernovsky, G, Rychik, J, Gaynor, J W, Spray, T L, Feudtner, C, Nelson, R M (2005). What factors are important to parents making decisions about neonatal research?. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 90: F267-f269 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Marcovitch, H. (2004). What's new this month in BMJ Journals. BMJ 329: 370-370 [Full Text]  

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Consent for Clinical Research on Neonates

K. J. S. Anand, et al.

Fetal Neonatal Ed. Online, 12 Jul 2004 [Full text]