ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Routine examination of the newborn and maternal satisfaction: a randomised controlled trial

D Wolke¹, S Dave², J Hayes², J Townsend², M Tomlin³

¹ Department of Psychology, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, Herts, UK
² Centre for Research in Primary and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire
³ Department of Midwifery and Child, University of Hertfordshire

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Professor Wolke, Department of Psychology, University of Hertfordshire, DWRU, College Lane, GB-Hatfield, Herts AL10 9AB, UK;
D.F.H.Wolke{at}herts.ac.uk

Objective: To determine whether the routine examination of the newborn by a midwife compared with a junior paediatrician (SHO) affects maternal satisfaction with this examination.

Methods: Randomised controlled trial: 826 mother and baby pairs in a district general hospital in south east England were randomised to a paediatric SHO or a midwife for the routine newborn examination. Maternal satisfaction with the examination was analysed in relation to intervention group, process, and background variables.

Results: Some 81% of mothers reported that they were satisfied or very satisfied with the newborn examination. Mothers assigned to a midwife were more satisfied with the newborn examination (crude odds ratio (OR) 0.54 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.39 to 0.75), p < 0.001). However, after provision of health education during the examination, continuity of care provided, and history of miscarriage had been controlled for, status of examiner was no longer related to maternal satisfaction (adjusted OR 0.82 (95% CI 0.57–1.20), NS). The discussion of healthcare issues by the examiner (adjusted OR 0.49 (95% CI 0.34 to 0.70), p < 0.001) and continuity of care (adjusted OR 0.43 (95% CI 0.23 to 0.81), p < 0.01) were both related to enhanced satisfaction, and history of miscarriage (adjusted OR 1.61 (1.08 to 2.40), p < 0.05) was associated with lower maternal satisfaction with the newborn examination. Midwives (61%) were more likely than SHOs (33%) to discuss healthcare issues, such as feeding, sleeping, and skin care.

Conclusions: Mothers were more likely to be satisfied with the newborn examination by a midwife than an SHO because midwives were more likely to discuss healthcare issues during the examination and were able to provide continuity of care. However, midwife examinations according to exclusion criteria agreed with trial midwives excluded half of all newborns, and criteria may have to be reconsidered for practice implementation.

Keywords: examination; midwife; senior house officer (SHO); maternal satisfaction; miscarriage

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Fantoms

Martin Ward-Platt
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2002 86: F142. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Wong, H, Kadalraja, R (2008). Early discharge of newborn infants before formal neonatal examination: a new model of practice. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 93: F476-F476 [Full Text]  
• Patton, C, Hey, E (2006). How effectively can clinical examination pick up congenital heart disease at birth?. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 91: F263-F267 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Britton, J. R. (2006). Global Satisfaction With Perinatal Hospital Care: Stability and Relationship to Anxiety, Depression, and Stressful Medical Events. American Journal of Medical Quality 21: 200-205 [Abstract]  
• Hall, D, Wilkinson, A R (2005). Quality of care by neonatal nurse practitioners: a review of the Ashington experiment. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 90: F195-F200 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• (2003). OTHER ARTICLES NOTED (Nov 01 to 18 Oct 02). Evid. Based Nurs. 6: e1-1 [Full Text]  

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Attitudes to routine neonatal examination

Guy C Millman, et al.

Fetal Neonatal Ed. Online, 23 May 2002 [Full text]

Authors’ reply: SHOs attitudes towards the neonatal examination

Dieter Wolke, et al.

Fetal Neonatal Ed. Online, 7 Jun 2002 [Full text]