Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition 2002;86:F91-F95; doi:10.1136/fn.86.2.F91
Copyright © 2002 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health.
Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal and Neonatal Edition 2002;86:F91-F95
© 2002 Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal and Neonatal Edition

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Newborn screening for Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a psychosocial study

E P Parsons1, A J Clarke2, K Hood3, E Lycett4, D M Bradley5

1 School of Nursing and Midwifery Studies, University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff, UK
2 Institute of Medical Genetics, University of Wales College of Medicine
3 Division of General Practice, University of Wales College of Medicine
4 Family and Child Psychology Research Centre, City University, London, UK
5 Department of Medical Biochemistry, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr Parsons, School of Nursing and Midwifery Studies, UWCM, Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4XN, Wales, UK;
parsonsep{at}cardiff.ac.uk

Objective: To evaluate the psychosocial implications of newborn screening for Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

Design: Prospective psychosocial assessment.

Setting: Primary care.

Respondents: Study: (a) families of an affected boy identified by screening (n = 20); (b) families of a boy with a transient screening abnormality (n = 18). Control: (a) families of a boy with a later clinical diagnosis (n = 16); (b) random sample of mothers of boys aged 6–9 months (n = 43).

Interventions: Questionnaires and semistructured interviews.

Main outcome measures: Attitudes to newborn screening and impact of screening on mother-baby relationship, anxiety/wellbeing, and reproductive patterning within families of an affected boy.

Results: Most families of an affected boy were in favour of newborn screening on the grounds of reproductive choice and time to prepare emotionally and practically. There was no evidence of any long term disruption to the mother-baby relationship. Anxiety levels for the screened group were slightly above threshold but returned to normal during the period of the study. There was no evidence, from anxiety or wellbeing scores, that the transient group had suffered any disadvantage. Although the profile of the screened and later clinically diagnosed cohorts was similar after diagnosis, when boys from the screened cohort were 4 years old and more socially aware, their profile was more positive. There was evidence that reproductive patterning had been modified, and four fetuses carrying a mutation causing Duchenne muscular dystrophy were terminated.

Conclusion: A case can be made for newborn screening provided that the test is optional, a rigorous protocol for service delivery is used, and an infrastructure providing continuing support is in place.

Keywords: screening; Duchenne muscular dystrophy; psychosocial genetics


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Downing, M., Pollitt, R. (2008). Newborn bloodspot screening in the UK - past, present and future. Ann Clin Biochem 45: 11-17 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Kerruish, N. J., Campbell-Stokes, P. L., Gray, A., Merriman, T. R., Robertson, S. P., Taylor, B. J. (2007). Maternal Psychological Reaction to Newborn Genetic Screening for Type 1 Diabetes. Pediatrics 120: e324-e335 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Acharya, K., Ackerman, P. D., Ross, L. F. (2005). Pediatricians' Attitudes Toward Expanding Newborn Screening. Pediatrics 116: e476-e484 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Kerruish, N J, Robertson, S P (2005). Newborn screening: new developments, new dilemmas. J. Med. Ethics 31: 393-398 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Latest from ADC

 

ADC is co-owned by the RCPCH and is the official journal of the European Academy of Paediatrics

BMJ Careers - Latest Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs

Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs