Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition 2001;85:F82-F85; doi:10.1136/fn.85.2.F82
Copyright © 2001 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health.
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2001;85:F82-F85 ( September )

A randomised controlled trial of two methods of delivering nasal continuous positive airway pressure after extubation to infants weighing less than 1000 g: binasal (Hudson) versus single nasal prongs

P Davis, M Davies, B Faber

Department of Paediatrics, Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Correspondence to: Dr Davis, Royal Women's Hospital, 132 Grattan St, Carlton, Victoria 3053, Australia pgd{at}unimelb.edu.au

Accepted 15 March 2001

OBJECTIVES---Primary: to determine whether nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) delivered through binasal prongs results in a greater proportion of extremely low birthweight infants being successfully extubated, after a period of intermittent positive pressure ventilation, than nasal CPAP delivered by a single nasal prong. Secondary: to evaluate the effect of mode of delivery of nasal CPAP after extubation on the need for endotracheal reintubation, weight gain, rates of feeding intolerance, sepsis, suspected sepsis, cranial ultrasound abnormalities, retinopathy of prematurity, chronic lung disease, and the duration of assisted ventilation and care in the tertiary neonatal unit.
DESIGN AND SETTING---Randomised, controlled, clinical trial conducted at the neonatal intensive care unit of the Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
PATIENTS---Infants of birth weight less than 1000 g, ventilated, requiring < 50% oxygen and ventilator rate less than or equal to 20/minute, and considered by the clinical management team to be ready for extubation.
INTERVENTION---Infants were randomly allocated to receive nasal CPAP delivered through binasal (Hudson) prongs or a single nasal prong.
PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE---Failure of extubation as defined by the following criteria: (a) apnoea (more than one episode/hour over a six hour period or one episode requiring bag and mask ventilation); (b) absolute increase in oxygen requirement greater than 15% above that required before extubation; (c) respiratory acidosis (pH < 7.25 with PCO2 > 6.67 kPa).
RESULTS---Ten of the 41 (24%) infants randomised to binasal prongs reached predetermined failure criteria compared with 26 of the 46 (57%) infants randomised to a single nasal prong (p = 0.005). Four of 17 (24%) infants of birth weight less than 800 g extubated to binasal prongs reached failure criteria compared with 14 of 16 (88%) extubated to a single nasal prong (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in any of the secondary outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS---For extremely low birthweight infants ventilated using an endotracheal tube, nasal CPAP delivered through binasal (Hudson) prongs is more effective in preventing failure of extubation than that delivered through a single nasal prong.


Keywords: ventilation; continuous positive airway pressure; extremely low birth weight infant; extubation


© 2001 by Archives of Disease in Childhood

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • (2003). OTHER ARTICLES NOTED (Nov 01 to 18 Oct 02). Evid. Based Nurs. 6: e1-1 [Full Text]  
  • De Paoli, A G, Morley, C J, Davis, P G, Lau, R, Hingeley, E (2002). In vitro comparison of nasal continuous positive airway pressure devices for neonates. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 87: F42-45 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Latest from ADC

 

ADC is co-owned by the RCPCH and is the official journal of the European Academy of Paediatrics

BMJ Careers - Latest Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs

Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs