A randomised controlled trial of two methods of delivering nasal continuous positive airway pressure after extubation to infants weighing less than 1000 g: binasal (Hudson) versus single nasal prongs
P Davis, M Davies, B Faber
Department of
Paediatrics, Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Correspondence to: Dr Davis, Royal Women's Hospital, 132 Grattan St, Carlton, Victoria 3053, Australia pgd{at}unimelb.edu.au
Accepted 15 March 2001
OBJECTIVES
Primary: to
determine whether nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)
delivered through binasal prongs results in a greater proportion of
extremely low birthweight infants being successfully extubated, after a
period of intermittent positive pressure ventilation, than nasal CPAP
delivered by a single nasal prong. Secondary: to evaluate the effect of
mode of delivery of nasal CPAP after extubation on the need for
endotracheal reintubation, weight gain, rates of feeding intolerance,
sepsis, suspected sepsis, cranial ultrasound abnormalities, retinopathy
of prematurity, chronic lung disease, and the duration of assisted
ventilation and care in the tertiary neonatal unit.
DESIGN AND
SETTING
Randomised, controlled, clinical trial
conducted at the neonatal intensive care unit of the Royal Women's
Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
PATIENTS
Infants of
birth weight less than 1000 g, ventilated, requiring < 50% oxygen
and ventilator rate less than or equal to 20/minute, and considered by
the clinical management team to be ready for extubation.
INTERVENTION
Infants
were randomly allocated to receive nasal CPAP delivered through binasal
(Hudson) prongs or a single nasal prong.
PRIMARY OUTCOME
MEASURE
Failure of extubation as defined by the
following criteria: (a) apnoea (more than
one episode/hour over a six hour period or one episode requiring bag
and mask ventilation); (b) absolute increase
in oxygen requirement greater than 15% above that required before
extubation; (c) respiratory acidosis
(pH < 7.25 with PCO2 > 6.67 kPa).
RESULTS
Ten of the 41 (24%) infants randomised to binasal prongs reached predetermined
failure criteria compared with 26 of the 46 (57%) infants randomised
to a single nasal prong (p = 0.005). Four of 17 (24%) infants of
birth weight less than 800 g extubated to binasal prongs reached
failure criteria compared with 14 of 16 (88%) extubated to a single
nasal prong (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in
any of the secondary outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS
For
extremely low birthweight infants ventilated using an endotracheal
tube, nasal CPAP delivered through binasal (Hudson) prongs is more
effective in preventing failure of extubation than that delivered
through a single nasal prong.
Keywords: ventilation; continuous positive airway pressure; extremely low birth weight infant; extubation
© 2001 by Archives of Disease in Childhood
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
(2003). OTHER ARTICLES NOTED (Nov 01 to 18 Oct 02). Evid. Based Nurs.
6: e1-1
[Full Text] -
De Paoli, A G, Morley, C J, Davis, P G, Lau, R, Hingeley, E
(2002). In vitro comparison of nasal continuous positive airway pressure devices for neonates. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.
87: F42-45
[Abstract] [Full Text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.



