Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition 2001;85:F100-F104; doi:10.1136/fn.85.2.F100
Copyright © 2001 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health.
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2001;85:F100-F104 ( September )

Routine neonatal examination: effectiveness of trainee paediatrician compared with advanced neonatal nurse practitioner

T W R Lee, R E Skelton, C Skene

Department of Paediatrics, Hull and East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Anlaby Road, Hull HU3 2JZ, UK

Correspondence to: Dr Lee, Department of Paediatrics, Level 5, Clinical Sciences Building, St James's University Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK timlee{at}doctors.org.uk

Accepted 25 June 2001

OBJECTIVE---To compare the effectiveness of routine neonatal examination performed by senior house officers (SHOs) and advanced neonatal nurse practitioners (ANNPs).
DESIGN---A prospective study of all infants referred to specialist orthopaedic, ophthalmology, and cardiology clinics. A standardised proforma was used to record details of the professional performing the neonatal check, any abnormalities discovered, source of ultimate referral to the specialist clinic, and specialist findings.
RESULTS---527 eligible infants were recruited. For hip abnormalities, ANNPs displayed greater sensitivity than SHOs (96% v 74%; p < 0.05). Similarly for eye abnormalities, ANNPs were more sensitive (100% v 33%; p < 0.05). There were no significant differences between ANNPs and SHOs in terms of positive predictive values or effectiveness of detecting cardiac abnormalities. There was no difference in underlying incidence of abnormalities between the two hospitals.
CONCLUSION---ANNPs are significantly more effective in detecting abnormalities during the neonatal check. This has implications both for future workforce planning and current methods of medical training.


Keywords: examination; advanced neonatal nurse practitioner; training


© 2001 by Archives of Disease in Childhood

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Green, K, Oddie, S (2008). The value of the postnatal examination in improving child health. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 93: F389-F393 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Onuzo, O C (2006). How effectively can clinical examination pick up congenital heart disease at birth?. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 91: F236-F237 [Full Text]  
  • Patton, C, Hey, E (2006). How effectively can clinical examination pick up congenital heart disease at birth?. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 91: F263-F267 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Shipman, S. A., Helfand, M., Moyer, V. A., Yawn, B. P. (2006). Screening for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: A Systematic Literature Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Pediatrics 117: e557-e576 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Hall, D, Wilkinson, A R (2005). Quality of care by neonatal nurse practitioners: a review of the Ashington experiment. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 90: F195-F200 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Leslie, A, Stephenson, T (2003). Neonatal transfers by advanced neonatal nurse practitioners and paediatric registrars. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 88: F509-512 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Dezateux, C, Brown, J, Arthur, R, Karnon, J, Parnaby, A (2003). Performance, treatment pathways, and effects of alternative policy options for screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip in the United Kingdom. Arch. Dis. Child. 88: 753-759 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Brown, J, Dezateux, C, Karnon, J, Parnaby, A, Arthur, R (2003). Efficiency of alternative policy options for screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip in the United Kingdom. Arch. Dis. Child. 88: 760-766 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Smith, S L, Hall, M A (2003). Developing a neonatal workforce: role evolution and retention of advanced neonatal nurse practitioners. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 88: F426-F429 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Case for ANNPs not yet proven
Cliona Ni Bhrolchain
Fetal Neonatal Ed. Online, 4 Sep 2001 [Full text]
Re: Case for ANNPs not yet proven
Tim Lee
Fetal Neonatal Ed. Online, 10 Sep 2001 [Full text]
Case for ANNPs is now proven!
Cliona Ni Bhrolchain
Fetal Neonatal Ed. Online, 18 Sep 2001 [Full text]
Presentation of sensitivity alone may mislead
Gabrielle Laing
Fetal Neonatal Ed. Online, 3 Oct 2001 [Full text]
Re: Presentation of sensitivity alone may mislead
Tim Lee
Fetal Neonatal Ed. Online, 23 Oct 2001 [Full text]

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Latest from ADC

 

ADC is co-owned by the RCPCH and is the official journal of the European Academy of Paediatrics

BMJ Careers - Latest Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs

Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs