Arch. Dis. Child

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Read responses to this article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in ADC Online
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ng, P C
Right arrow Articles by Cheng, A F B
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ng, P C
Right arrow Articles by Cheng, A F B
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2001;84:F177-F182 ( May )

Randomised controlled study of oral erythromycin for treatment of gastrointestinal dysmotility in preterm infants

P C Nga, K W Soa, K S C Fungb, C H Leea, T F Foka, E Wongc, W Wonga, K L Cheunga, A F B Chengb

a Department of Paediatrics, Prince of Wales Hospital, Chinese University of Hong Kong, b Department of Microbiology, c Centre for Clinical Trials and Epidemiological Research

Correspondence to: Professor Ng, Department of Paediatrics, Level 6, Clinical Sciences Building, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, NT, Hong Kong pakcheungng{at}cuhk.edu.hk

Accepted 4 January 2001

AIM---To evaluate the effectiveness of oral erythromycin as a prokinetic agent for the treatment of moderately severe gastrointestinal dysmotility in preterm very low birthweight infants.
METHODS---A prospective, double blind, randomised, placebo controlled study in a tertiary referral centre of a university teaching hospital was conducted on 56 preterm infants (< 1500 g) consecutively admitted to the neonatal unit. The infants were randomly allocated by minimisation to receive oral erythromycin (12.5 mg/kg, every six hours for 14 days) or an equivalent volume of placebo solution (normal saline) if they received less than half the total daily fluid intake or less than 75 ml/kg/day of milk feeds by the enteral route on day 14 of life. The times taken to establish half, three quarters, and full enteral feeding after the drug treatment were compared between the two groups. Potential adverse effects of oral erythromycin and complications associated with parenteral nutrition were assessed as secondary outcomes.
RESULTS---Twenty seven and 29 infants received oral erythromycin and placebo solution respectively. The times taken to establish half, three quarters, and full enteral feeding after the drug treatment were significantly shorter in the group receiving oral erythromycin than in those receiving the placebo (p < 0.05, p < 0.05 and p < 0.0001 respectively). There was also a trend suggesting that more infants with prolonged feed intolerance developed cholestatic jaundice in the placebo than in the oral erythromycin group (10 v 5 infants). None of the infants receiving oral erythromycin developed cardiac dysrhythmia, pyloric stenosis, or septicaemia caused by multiresistant organisms.
CONCLUSIONS---Oral erythromycin is effective in facilitating enteral feeding in preterm very low birthweight infants with moderately severe gastrointestinal dysmotility. Treated infants can achieve full enteral feeding 10 days earlier, and this may result in a substantial saving on hyperalimentation. However, until the safety of erythromycin has been confirmed in preterm infants, this treatment modality should remain experimental. Prophylactic or routine use of this medication for treatment of mild cases of gastrointestinal dysmotility is probably not warranted at this stage.


Keywords: erythromycin; gastrointestinal dysmotility; enteral feeding; preterm; very low birthweight infants; randomised controlled trial


© 2001 by Archives of Disease in Childhood



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
V R Kairamkonda, A Deorukhkar, C Bruce, R Coombs, R Fraser, and A-P T Mayer
Amylin peptide is increased in preterm neonates with feed intolerance
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., July 1, 2008; 93(4): F265 - F270.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeoReviewsHome page
K. W. So and P. C. Ng
International Perspectives: Neonatology in Hong Kong: 10 Years After the Return of Sovereignty to China
NeoReviews, December 1, 2007; 8(12): e513 - e521.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EDUCATION AND PRACTICEHome page
S. Keady
Update on drugs for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease
Arch. Dis. Child. Ed. Pract., August 1, 2007; 92(4): ep114 - ep118.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
S Patole, S Rao, and D Doherty
Erythromycin as a prokinetic agent in preterm neonates: a systematic review
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., July 1, 2005; 90(4): F301 - f306.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
M. F Chicella, L A. Batres, M. S Heesters, and J. E Dice
Prokinetic Drug Therapy in Children: A Review of Current Options
Ann. Pharmacother., April 1, 2005; 39(4): 706 - 711.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
C. F. Poets
Gastroesophageal Reflux: A Critical Review of Its Role in Preterm Infants
Pediatrics, February 1, 2004; 113(2): e128 - 132.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AAP Grand RoundsHome page
D. R. Focht III and L. L. Barton
Erythromycin Fails to Improve Feeding Tolerance in Preterm Infants
AAP Grand Rounds, December 1, 2003; 10(6): 76 - 76.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Evid. Based Nurs.Home page
OTHER ARTICLES NOTED (Nov 01 to 18 Oct 02)
Evid. Based Nurs., January 1, 2003; 6(1): e1 - 1.
[Full Text] [PDF]

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Erythromycin for feeding intolerance
HD Dellagrammaticas
Fetal Neonatal Ed. Online, 8 May 2001 [Full text]
Treatment of dysmotility in preterm infant: Erythromycin or early feeding?
M Yadav
Fetal Neonatal Ed. Online, 11 Jun 2001 [Full text]



HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
ARCH DIS CHILD FETAL NEONATAL ED ED PRACTICE
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2001 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health